Why Some Artists Destroy Their Art: A Personal and Philosophical Journey

Artists may destroy their work for a variety of compelling reasons, spanning concepts of permanence, personal expression, critique of commercialism, and artistic experimentation. Personally, I have engaged in this practice, turning my art into something new by tearing it apart. In this article, we explore the motivations behind artists who choose to destroy their creations and the profound insights it shares about art and creativity.

The Conceptual Intent Behind Destruction

Some artists view destruction as an integral part of their artistic process, using it to make a statement about the impermanence of art. This act can be a powerful way to challenge traditional notions of value and ownership, highlighting that art is not merely a product for sale but a reflection of human experience. Just as natural landscapes and cycles of life are transient, so too is the art that aims to capture them. In the words of an artist in the graphic arts school I attended, the act of destroying a canvas can lead to the creation of something truly meaningful and intriguing.

Personal Expression and Self-Destruction

Artists may destroy a piece that no longer resonates with them personally, as a way to reclaim agency and evolve their style or beliefs. My journey through art school was a testament to this, where I skipped most classes and spent hours at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, studying the works of impressionists like Van Gogh and Manet. Even after graduation, I continued to paint over 10 canvasses that I didn’t like, stretching and rebuilding 15 more, asking myself continuously until I found something new. It was a path filled with personal growth, an exploration of my own psyche and ideals.

Critique of Commercialism

Destroying art can also serve as a critique of the art market and the commodification of creativity. It is a way to emphasize that art should be more than a mere product for sale. By destroying their work, artists can highlight the inherent value of art as a form of expression and communication rather than just a commodity. In my case, the loss of family artwork to the dump was a stark reminder of how easily art can be forgotten or discarded, prompting a deeper reflection on the longevity and worth of artistic endeavors.

Performance Art and Spectacle

For some artists, the act of destruction itself can be a form of performance art. The physical act of tearing down and rebuilding can draw attention and create a spectacle, prompting viewers to engage in a dialogue about art and its meaning. Picasso’s advice to "destroy your canvas until you create something interesting" reflects this idea, suggesting that the process of destruction and creation is integral to the artistic experience. I have followed this advice, finding liberation in the act of tearing apart my own work and allowing it to transform into something unexpected and new.

Symbols of Growth and Change

Destroying art can also serve as a symbolic gesture, representing a break from the past, a cathartic release, or a way to signify personal growth or change. Art is a reflection of our inner world, and when we embrace change, it can lead to profound creative transformations. The impermanence of art is a harsh reality, but it is also a powerful reminder that everything changes, and this can be a liberating thought when applied to our artistic journey.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In conclusion, the destruction of art can serve as a powerful commentary on the nature of creativity and the artist's relationship with their work. As an artist, I have found that destroying art is a liberating and humbling experience. It allows me to explore new techniques and ideas, and it helps me to cope with the impermanence of my creations. If you are an artist, go ahead and destroy something. It will challenge your perspective and push you to create something new and exciting.