Why 'Pro-life' Not 'Pro-fetus': A Critical Analysis of Abortion Politics and Ethics

The term 'pro-life' has been widely used to advocate for the protection of the unborn, but why not 'pro-fetus'? This article explores the ethical and political dimensions of the debate surrounding abortion, and the implications of using different terminology.

Understanding the Political Context

The absence of a serious political movement to harm or kill newborn babies highlights the inherent danger of focusing solely on the unborn. While there may not currently be a large-scale movement targeting babies, the ethical complexity of abortion remains a contentious issue. Just as there are no local Moloch temples where newborns can be sacrificed, the fight against harmful practices is an ongoing effort. However, it is important to recognize that absent threats do not justify complacency or inaction.

Exploitation of Life

The anti-abortion movement is often criticized for its lack of concern for actual people and their well-being. Instead, the focus is on exploiting life for economic and social gains. In the context of two major religions in America—capitalism and Christianity—individuals often see fetuses as tools rather than living beings. This perspective is problematic as it reduces the value of human life to a means for economic and religious exploitation. The objective is to brainwash and integrate these individuals into the workforce without genuine regard for their long-term well-being.

Pro-life Beyond the Womb

Pro-life advocates, especially those of the Catholic faith, extend their principles beyond the womb. The Catholic Church, for instance, stands against the death penalty and advocates for an end to other atrocities such as war and euthanasia. This broad perspective suggests that pro-life advocates are concerned with the protection and dignity of all human life, not just the unborn.

Abortion as Murder

Camille Paglia's quote aptly captures the ethical dimensions of abortion. She argues that abortion is a form of murder, stating, 'abortion is the extermination of the powerless by the powerful.' This perspective highlights the power dynamics at play and the ethical consequences of supporting such a practice. Instead of facing the harsh realities of abortion, many liberals and their supporters have chosen to avoid confronting the ethical implications of their actions.

The Cost Factor

The convenience of pro-life rhetoric is also a significant factor. Advocating for unborn life can be done without any real financial or emotional investment. This nonchalance towards the woman carrying the fetus and the broader societal implications is a underlying issue. Additionally, there are lawmakers who oppose policies that would provide support to women, such as covering medical expenses or offering time off work. Their stance is more about placing blame on the women who choose to have abortions rather than addressing the root causes of unwanted pregnancies.

In summary, the choice to label oneself 'pro-life' rather than 'pro-fetus' reflects the narrow focus of the movement. While it highlights the importance of the unborn, it fails to address the broader ethical and humanitarian issues. The term 'pro-life' should encompass a commitment to the protection of all human life, not just the unborn. This distinction is crucial for a more holistic and ethical approach to the debate surrounding abortion.