Wilders does not consider the settlements to be an obstacle to peace. Instead, he views them as a means to ensure Israel's security and to prevent any future conflicts that could arise due to the mere existence of these communities. He argues that the international community's focus on settlements as a hindrance to peace overlooks the complex historical and strategic factors that have shaped the conflict.

United Nations and Proportionate Focus

Wilders believes that the United Nations is heavily biased against Israel, a perception that is echoed by previous and current leadership. Ban Ki-moon, the former Secretary-General of the United Nations, acknowledged this bias by stating that the UN has a disproportionate focus on Israel. Wilders sees this bias as a direct manifestation of the organization's partiality towards one side of the conflict, which, in his view, is unjust and undermines the pursuit of a balanced and fair international discourse.

Muslim and Arab Cultures

Wilders's opposition to UN Resolution 2334 is also underpinned by his strong dislike for Muslim and Arab cultures. He views these cultures as incompatible with Western values and believes that the international community's support for settlements reflects a broader trend of favoring these cultures over Israel. This cultural and ideological stance influences his political positions and shapes his opposition to measures that he perceives as supporting an adversarial stance towards Israel.

Interference with Sovereignty

Wilders views the United Nations as one more body that seeks to interfere with the sovereignty of nations. He argues that the resolution is an attempt to assert international control over what he sees as internal Israeli affairs. This interference, in his opinion, is not only unwelcome but also unnecessary, as Israel has the right and capability to manage its own security and development.

Close Ties to Trump and Netanyahu

Wilders's support for UN Resolution 2334 is influenced by his strong ties to both former US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump's anti-settlement stance, while not aligning perfectly with Wilders's views, shares a common goal of challenging the international community's stance on Israeli settlements. Netanyahu, on the other hand, has a personal and political relationship with Wilders, making their alignment on this issue both expected and symbolic.

Obama's Revenge and Qatana’s Speech

Wilders perceives UN Resolution 2334 as a political backlash against Netanyahu, which he views as part of the Obama administration's "revenge" for Netanyahu’s speech to the US Congress in 2011, in which Netanyahu criticized the Iran nuclear deal. Wilders sees this resolution as a further humiliation of Netanyahu and a strategic move to weaken Israel's position in international negotiations.

Conclusion

Geert Wilders's opposition to UN Resolution 2334 is rooted in his unwavering support for Israel, his perception of bias in the United Nations, and his broader views on cultural and geopolitical issues. Understanding his stance requires examining these complex factors and the interplay between them. Wilders's opposition demonstrates a deep-seated commitment to the principles of sovereignty, security, and cultural affirmation that he believes underpin the Israeli state and its policies.