When Serial Killer Dies: Is the Case Truly Resolved?

The discovery of a serial killer's death often prompts a mix of relief and confusion among law enforcement and the public. However, the closure that it brings is not always as straightforward as one might assume.

Why the Investigation Does Not End with the Death of the Suspect

When a serial killer is apprehended and subsequently dies, it might be tempting to declare the case resolved. But is it really?

Did the Killer Act Alone?

Most serial killers operate alone, but history proves otherwise. Case studies like Dean Corll and Ken LoBianco demonstrate that some serial killers had assistance in their crimes. If the death of a primary suspect results in the inaction of a sub-suspect, the investigation may miss crucial leads, leading to continued danger for the community.

Uncovered Victims or Ongoing Investigation?

Posthumously declaring a serial killer's case closed does not account for the possibility that more victims might be undiscovered.

For instance, the hunt for Randy Kraft in Southern California led to the identification of victims, but what if William Bonin and Patrick Kearney had been overlooked? If the police had prematurely ceased their investigation into Kraft, the other two killers might have remained undetected, resulting in further deaths.

The Impact on the Victims' Families

The closure of a case is often seen as a form of justice for the victims' families. However, without a definitive ruling or a full investigation, these families may never receive the answers they seek.

The families would be denied the chance to see the killer face their crimes, hear their impact on the lives of the victims, and possibly even understand their loved one's final moments. Closure is not just about the closure of the case but also about the closure for those who lost their loved ones.

Challenges in Investigation

The death of a serial killer marks a transition rather than an end. It changes the direction and focus of the investigation. The police must now shift from identifying and arresting the perpetrator to closing the case through evidence and documentation.

Coroners or courts play a critical role in verifying the identity of the deceased and confirming that the suspect is, indeed, the right person. Even then, the investigation does not stop there. There is a need to review all the evidence, interview witnesses, and determine if the killer acted alone or had accomplices.

Conclusion

The death of a serial killer does not necessarily mean the case is solved. Extensive investigation, including the identification of accomplices, the discovery of potential victims, and the fulfillment of justice for the victims' families, are all necessary steps. The end of a suspect's life marks the beginning of a new chapter in the case, where the focus shifts from apprehension to resolution.