The Overemphasis on STEM Subjects and the Undervaluation of Arts: Balancing Academic Priorities

In modern educational systems, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects often receive a disproportionate amount of attention and resources, while the arts are frequently overlooked. This article explores the reasons behind this imbalance and argues for a more balanced approach in prioritizing academic subjects.

STEM vs Arts: What Are the Differences?

STEM subjects such as Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, and Biology typically require a higher level of conceptual learning, cognitive skills, and hands-on practice. Conversely, subjects like Geography, History, and Legal Studies are more focused on theoretical knowledge and comprehension. While both categories require different sets of skills and methodologies, the emphasis often falls on STEM.

Financial Success and Artistic Pursuits

Another misconception is that individuals who pursue careers in the arts, such as movie stars, often earn significantly more than scientists, engineers, or doctors. However, this misconception glosses over several critical points. Firstly, the probability of success for an artist is statistically lower compared to a scientist, engineer, or doctor, considering the vast number of individuals attempting to enter these fields.

Additionally, many schools and administrators believe that STEM subjects are more valuable simply because they are deemed more technical and require more knowledge. They argue that this factor makes STEM students more likely to secure jobs outside of academia or higher education. Unfortunately, this perspective overlooks the diverse talents and potential of students who excel in the arts, such as musicians, painters, and potters. These individuals deserve equal attention and support to excel in their respective fields.

Value and Budget Cuts

During budget cuts in schools, arts subjects are often the first to be eliminated. This decision is shortsighted, as the arts play a crucial role in developing critical thinking, creativity, and emotional intelligence. They provide students with a well-rounded education and prepare them for a wide range of careers, from artistic professions to business and technology.

STEM Over Arts?

A common belief is that arts degrees are discouraged because they lack practical value and are a substantial investment of time and money. While it's true that many students with STEM degrees may not pursue careers directly related to their field, it's equally true that many arts graduates can find success in a variety of industries. For instance, a computer science graduate can become a sales representative for a vegan ice cream company, an EE from MIT can find employment in a variety of settings, and an electronics technician can work at a grocery store.

Equity in Educational Choices

Companies often seek a large pool of young, cost-effective programmers, leading to a skew towards STEM. However, long-term prosperity is not guaranteed by studying STEM alone. While STEM degrees may offer more direct industry connections, arts degrees can provide transferable skills and a broader career path. Students with an Arts background may excel in leadership, communication, and problem-solving, which are valuable skills in many sectors.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the overemphasis on STEM subjects and the undervaluation of arts subjects are misguided. Both fields are essential for a well-rounded education and equal opportunities for students. By recognizing the value of arts education and providing equal resources and support, we can ensure that all students have the chance to succeed regardless of their chosen path.

Keywords: STEM subjects, arts education, academic priorities, career success