The Desirability of Owning Great Art and the Dilemma of Personal Fulfillment vs. Market Value

Many people believe that owning art is a desirable endeavor, whether it be a painting, sculpture, or photograph. Is the allure of art purely financial, or are there deeper layers of value? This article explores the age-old debate over the true worth of art and whether owning it for its beauty and meaning or its financial value is more beneficial.

Centuries of Debate: The Value of Art

Art has been a subject of discussion for countless centuries, with its value being a matter of ongoing debate. Some argue that the worth of a piece of art is simply what someone is willing to pay for it. While others maintain that art should be valued based on its artistic merit, not its market value.

The Subjectivity of Art’s Value

The answer to the question of what makes art desirable is not straightforward. It depends on one’s perspective and the underlying intentions behind owning art. The following narrative delves into these nuances.

The Case for Delusional Art

Great art, in some cases, can become what I term Delusional Art. This moniker is broad and can encompass a spectrum of works that don't necessarily meet the definition of true artistry but bring comfort, mental solace, or personal fulfillment. For instance, someone inheriting 'millions of paint by numbers' art might find it soothing and fulfilling, but it doesn't hold significant artistic or market value. It is a form of anti-anxiety needlework that can offer personal fulfillment. Another case in point is a festively decorated rooftop installation that brings joy during the warmer months; or even the unexpected discovery of makeshift golden jewelry found amongst trash, which is a form of personal treasure.

The Ethical Dimension: Supporting Emerging Artists

Buying art from up-and-coming artists or most contemporary artists is a noble action. These artists rely on sales and appreciation to sustain their craft. Supporting them financially not only encourages the creation of more art but also contributes positively to society. However, one must tread carefully. If one acquires a Van Gogh or other critical masterpieces and locks them away to avoid paying taxes or laundering money, the ethical implications are severe. True art should serve a purpose and enrich lives, not be used for nefarious financial gain.

A Dream of Beauty and Heritage

Take, for example, the Farnsworth House designed by the renowned architect Mies van der Rohe. At one point in history, this house was metamorphosed from a dream project into a symbol of architectural poetry. Built for Edith Farnsworth, a well-educated and wealthy woman, the house symbolized a sanctuary from societal norms. However, it also posed challenges. Mies van der Rohe, known for his modernist approach, designed the house without blinds and curtains, leading to astronomical heating costs and the house becoming a "huge mosquito lamp" in the summer. This instance illustrates how great art can come with unintended and uncomfortable consequences.

Conclusion and Final Thoughts

The worth of art is a complex issue that varies from person to person. Whether one values art for its financial worth or its aesthetic and meaningful value, the ultimate reason for its acquisition should resonate with the owner. Art, at its core, should serve a purpose, whether it's creating beauty, reducing stress, or enriching life in meaningful ways. Owning art should not only enrich one's personal life but also contribute positively to the world around us.