Debunking the Myths: Analyzing the Controversial Trump Bullet Photograph

Recently, a professional sport photographer challenged the claimed high shutter speed used in a photograph of Trump. The photographer suggested that using 1/8000 of a second for such a slow-moving subject as Trump is counterintuitive. This article will delve into the technical aspects of the photograph, examining the criteria and implications of using this shutter speed, and the inquiries raised by the FBI.

Technical Analysis of the Shutter Speed

Simple math tells us that a bullet moving at 3,000 feet per second exposed for 1/8000 of a second would leave a streak of 0.375 feet or about 4.5 inches. Was this what the picture showed? This basic arithmetic is crucial in understanding the implications of the claimed shutter speed.

The professional photographer’s comment brings to light the misuse of high-speed shutter settings in non-photographic contexts. High-speed shutters, like 1/8000, are typically used to capture extremely fast-moving subjects such as bullets or high-speed sports. For a typical event like a political rally or speech, such a shutter speed would be both unusual and unnecessary.

Why Would a Bullet Speed Be Used?

The claim about Trump being photographed at 1/8000 of a second is intriguing. Since the subject, Trump, is not moving at such speeds, one might wonder why such a setting was used. There could be several technical or artistic reasons for this, suggesting either an attempt to capture a moment of high motion or to ensure clarity in a potentially chaotic or fast-moving scenario.

For instance, if the context of the photograph involved rapid motion or required high detail in a dynamic scene, such as a background moving swiftly, a high shutter speed like 1/8000 could be justifiable. However, with Trump as the subject, the utility of such a speed is questionable.

Further Investigations by the FBI

Fortunately, the FBI has already conducted a comprehensive investigation into the photograph, including the equipment used, the film, the environment, and more. Their findings could provide further insight into the exact shutter speed and the equipment used to capture the image.

Other factors that could be considered include whether a bullet could leave a vortex of disturbed air that could be picked up by the film. To determine the exact conditions, a detailed analysis of the photograph’s equipment and film is necessary. This could help resolve the mystery surrounding the photograph and confirm the actual shutter speed used.

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding the Trump bullet picture raises interesting questions about the technical and artistic choices behind the photograph. While a high shutter speed like 1/8000 might be justified for certain subjects or scenarios, its application to a human subject like Trump is perplexing. The FBI’s investigation, which has already been completed, may hold the answers to these questions.

Investigating and understanding the technical aspects of photography can help in determining the authenticity of such claims. It is always essential to consider the context, equipment, and environment when examining photographs, particularly those of such significance as the one involving Trump.